This page is designed for accessibility. Content is obtainable and functional to any browser or Internet device. This page's full visual experience is available in a graphical browser that supports web standards. Please consider upgrading your web browser.

              Beyond Sabbatical: Promise for a Program Church

              The Rev Karen Johnson Gustafson

January 9, 2005

 

              One year ago I stood here to offer my parting comments at the beginning of a five-month sabbatical leave.

               

               The conditions of sabbatical are outlined in most Unitarian Universalist ministers letters of agreement with the congregations they serve. The minister is entitled to one month of sabbatical for each full year of service up to six months and not to be taken until the 4th year of service. Following the sabbatical leave, the minister agrees to complete one year of additional service to the church per contract guidelines. The purpose of sabbatical leave is to allow for growth and development of the ministry by a process of educational and spiritual renewal.

               

              The idea of  sabbatical leave comes partially from the idea of sabbath as described by Rabbi Heschel in this mornings reading. Implicit in this statement is that the congregation, like the world, has already been created and will survive without the help of its minister. What is also implicit is the expectation that there will be a return and that there will be some evidence that the seed of eternity  planted in the soul has been cared for.

 

When I left last January, it was clearly time. As one of you wrote in your evaluation of the ministry of the church done earlier last fall, I do not feel that Karen is a driving force in our church. I guess dynamic is what I mean. She seems tired. We have such potential, not yet tapped, in our present congregation and I don't see Karen unleashing those energies.

 

I could easily have written those words myself. It is hard to inspire when one is so tired and uninspired.

 

In that January 2004 sermon and in the subsequent newsletters I outlined to you the activities of my time away.  I spent January in Chicago at Meadville Lombard Theological School where I felt like a sponge soaking up the raw stuff of academic, political and social discourse in a classes entitled "Liberal Religious Ethics" and "Evil, Trauma and Ambiguity", classes that ran thirty hours each in two consecutive weeks. Those taking the classes were a mix of students preparing to enter the ministry and a handful of veteran ministers. The mix was interesting because the ministers, mostly on study leave of one kind or another, were seeking inspiration. The students facing uncharted life in the parish were looking for application. There was plenty of both. The service this fall at the end of November, "Native American Wisdom", came from the work I did in the Liberal Religious Ethics class where we focused heavily on issues of ethnic diversity. The service on democracy in mid- October was born there as well. I will be using resources from the "Evil" class to prepare for the January 30 service.

 

As much as anything else, I gleaned from this experience a renewed appreciation for the need to link with academic resources on a regular basis as a way of stimulating creative energy. Ironically, the day to day professional life of most ministers, including this one, does not lend itself naturally to those links. This, I am clear, is not an excuse but rather a challenge to find regular sources of intellectual stimulation and to expect support and encouragement from the congregation to do so. This January I will be working on a plan for my Doctor of Ministry thesis which will have something to do with what it means to say that Unitarian Universalism is a pluralistic faith tradition.

 

In February and early March of 2004, I rested and worked on my papers for my classes and wrapped up my consulting time with the Thunder Bay congregation. I cleaned closets and alphabetized my spice rack. I read novels and cooked for my husband. I looked at the lake. I nurtured the seed of eternity planted in my soul.

 

At the end of March I flew to London where I took up residence at the Manse at Rosslyn Hill, the minister's residence at Rosslyn Hill Unitarian Chapel. There I served as a five Sunday interim minister as they awaited their new settled minister who would arrive in May. They had been in and out of ministerial search for about five years due to some false starts and mismatches and the mixed feelings of anticipation and apprehension were running high. It is a congregation of about 100 members , about two-thirds expatriates of one kind or another. Many American shared the story of coming for a month in 1979 or 1988 and deciding  to stay.

 

My short ministry at Rosslyn Hill Chapel was mostly about transition. I described myself at the British General Assembly in early April as the last of the tag team interims for Rosslyn Hill Chapel. It was gratifying to be able to provide a non-anxious presence for individuals who were needing to work through their stuck places in order to be fully open to the new minister. It was in some ways heartening to see that Unitarian Universalists, (or maybe just human beings) everywhere have a lot in common when it comes to resisting and embracing change. It was at least interesting to see that we are also, internationally, people of privilege, generally interested and engaged in educating ourselves about the world around us, supportive of the arts, passionate about ideas and desiring to care and to be cared for in return.

 

The time in England was valuable in many ways. It was my first experience of actually living in another culture (unless you consider Berkeley, Californis a" different culture"). The people were gracious and friendly and interesting. My work with them mostly involved Sunday services, pastoral care and some meetings with the Management Council which is like a combination of our Board and our Program Council. The rest of the time I was free to explore the neighborhood of Hampstead and the wonderful cultural opportunities of London. I walked and I walked, across the Hampstead Heath with its vista of the city, I attended plays and concerts and went to museums. I am so aware of the rich cultural, spirit building opportunities that are available right here that I seem to never find time for. When I came home, John and I became first-time season-ticket-holders to the Duluth Superior Symphony. From England I went to briefly to Amsterdam where I experienced flowers and music and the wrenching experience of touring Ann Frank's house with a bevy of European teen-agers whose lack of history will surely lead to its being repeated.

 

And then to Spa Belgium where I spent three days with the most energetic group of UUs ever- expatriates from all over Europe who gather twice each year and create the kind of community that we take so much for granted, that they are missing in their tiny fellowships in France and Germany and Holland and Spain and Denmark. I had the privilege of sharing the program with The Rev. Don Harrington who, at age ninety-one, holds out a vision for a future that reflects the lessons of the past. I will be sharing some of our combined insights with you in February.

 

And of course, in all this time, you were on my mind. I spent a good deal of time with your comments from the evaluation done just prior to my leaving. As many of you know, I am a passionate advocate for direct and timely feedback which, if received and processed and integrated, can be very helpful in shaping a ministry or any kind of relationship that is mutually satisfying. I will say that I found most of your comments to be thoughtful. I will also say that getting so many at once was a bit daunting. It is clear that we need to have a more effective, ongoing system of communication both about what you want and about what I can deliver. Some of that is embedded in the transition to a program church model.

 

In my farewell sermon of a year ago I said, "It is clear to me that I am at the end of my ministry of a pastoral church".

 

Many years ago, I did a sermon entitled "whose job is it?" I think that this was, for me, the clear beginning of our transition to a program church model. Up to then, things got done because the number of tasks and the number of people around to do them just worked out. When it didn't it was up to the minister to do them or to find someone else to do them. Twenty years ago, I left seminary with some vague notion that it was the minister who was  responsible for rites of passage, for worship, for maintaining a firm and constant grounding in our Unitarian Universalist tradition, for lifting up the larger vision of who you can be as a religious community; for nurturing and supporting the lay leadership and the staff; for being a Unitarian Universalist presence in the larger community. I soon came to realize that as minister of the First Unitarian Church of Duluth, I was also responsible  for turning on the heat and making soup for the newcomers orientation, for creating and maintaining the newcomers packets and hosting the Christmas Eve open house and maintaining the calendar, answering the phone and for what happened in most of the Sunday services including picking the hymns. There was no structure for visiting shut ins or people needing care and so what did or did not get done was done or not done by me. Of course, I got a lot of help. But I needed to ask. Certainly many people took initiative but when things did not get done, the buck often stopped with me. The years when I did not get a raise, everyone knew.

 

 I am not, I repeat, NOT complaining. There is a certain amount of nostalgia that I, and I think some of you, associate with that time.

 As the number of people in this congregation has increased, the needs as well as the resources to meet those needs have increased as well, but not in direct proportion. Human institutions are not based on mathematical formulas. They are based on some understanding that human needs and resources fluctuate in disproportionate ways. Over the past twenty years as our program and our Unitarian Universalist message has attracted new people, increasing our membership from ninety six in 1986 to two-hundred and twenty seven in 2005, the role of the minister has changed. Unchanging is the reality that each person here, by your presence, is part of the well spring that both needs and offers itself.  To be a healthy and functional organization of two-hundred and twenty seven  members and assorted friends, we have needed to build  structures to support the use of our resources.

 

The professional ministry is only one of those resources. Today, as the person currently serving that role, I am still the primary resource for pastoral care, for rites of passage, for worship, for maintaining a firm and constant grounding in our Unitarian Universalist tradition, for lifting up the larger vision of who you can be as a religious community; for nurturing and supporting the lay leadership and the staff; for being a Unitarian Universalist presence in the larger community. This was true when I came here nineteen years ago and it is true today. This was true before I left for sabbatical and it was true when I returned.

 

When I returned in May, the Board and I began the process of reintegration. They had done an amazing job of working to build bolder structures to support the use of our resources.

 

They had begun having quarterly half-day retreats where they could focus on aspects of the organization and life of the church that are beyond the scope of the regular Board meetings that deal with the nuts and bolts. Out of this came a new structure of Liaisons to support the work of Committees and other aspects of congregational life. In July the Board and the Committee on the Ministry met with Nancy Heege our UUA District Executive to explore the ways in which roles and expectations had changed during the sabbatical. What things had worked well and should remain in place? What did we learn about the needs for professional ministry in my absence?

 

Some major things have changed: One is the amount of energy and enthusiasm I have to engage in those things. Another is in the ways in which those resources of professional ministry are accessed, structured and delivered.

 

Four pieces of this that were firmly established in my absence were the Caring Community, an expanded role of the Worship Associates, greater intention on the part of the Membership Committee and an expanded role for the volunteer coordinator.

 

Here's what some of that means: The Caring Community structure sets up better lines of communication that do not assume that I am all knowing and all seeing. With the help of Julie Morgan and Warren High and others it is possible to get any number of caring concerns addressed, many that are impossible for me to see to personally and many that can be more effectively addressed by others. I expect to be contacted directly by individuals needing pastoral care or by referral from anyone from the caring community. This saves me the energy and anxiety associated with second guessing or needing to track down possible concerns.

 

The Worship Associates are a wonderful and capable group of people who take turns preparing the worship space, supporting guest speakers, and occasionally leading worship. This is an important factor in ensuring quality worship regardless of who is in the pulpit. A sub-committee of the worship committee has also taken on the aesthetic aspects of our worship space and we can thank them for the beautifully decorations we see here.

 

The Membership Committee handled the newcomers orientation in my absence and we have welcomed thirty new members since last year at this time. I will continue to participate in the orientations but the role of the committee will continue to expand.

 

And, we owe a great debt of gratitude to our Volunteer, Volunteer Coordinator, for all of her work in filling spaces and jobs in ways that I used to do.

 

I believe that what is different now is that we have moved significantly in the direction of a more shared ministry, a ministry that is shared among the elected, chosen and professional leadership and the congregation as a whole.

 

What you can expect from me is increased quality, presence and accountability in the areas of congregational life for which I am clearly responsible.

 

I therefore covenant or promise to

 

1.    be the primary resource for pastoral or spiritual care. Requests and referrals for such care need to be direct and timely. You can expect that if I cannot be available I will see to it that someone else can. For general caring concerns, the caring community is available and willing.

2.    to perform rites of passage; weddings, funerals, memorials , child dedications, house blessings.

3.     to lead  worship, and endeavor to keep myself stimulated intellectually and spiritually and to reflect that in our Sunday services.

4.      to  maintaining a firm and constant grounding in our Unitarian Universalist tradition.

5.    to lift up the larger vision of who you can be as a religious community

6.    to make as a priority the nurture and support of the lay leadership and the staff that they may continue to create and maintain the structures and resources that will serve the congregation..

7.     to will be a Unitarian Universalist presence in the larger community.

 

As partners in the shared ministry of this congregation, the Board and Lay Leadership of this congregation covenant to:

 

1.    Work hard to administer and lead the work of the church from the Board's new organizational model

2.    Continue make time to address in-depth issues beyond the scope of regular monthly meetings.

3.    Elevate programs for leadership development

4.    Continue to elevate efforts to assimilate new members and friends into the church community

5.    Continue to elevate efforts to help all members and friends become true stakeholders in this religious community

6.    Put programs and processes in place to help members and friends understanding of everyone's changing roles and responsibilities as we continue to evolve to a program church.

 

I cannot, of course, make such promises for you in this partnership, even though your agreements and needs are what drives all of the promises that you have heard thus far.

So here is my wish list for your covenant as partners in the ministry of this program church.

 

Could you covenant to:

 

1.    Make your needs and concerns and your appreciation known to the staff and leadership and the minister in a direct and timely manner.

2.    Read your newsletter carefully each month and respond with your presence at events, to requests for help

3.    Give generously of your time, energy and money in ways that reflect the value of this congregation in your life.

4.    Participate in the caring community by greeting newcomers, honoring the joys and concerns expressed in our services and responding for needs from your caring coordinators.

5.    Say "yes" when you know you will follow through, and "no" or "not at this time" if what you are being asked will lead to burn out or resentment

6.    Take advantage of this safe place to try new ways of being, to be healed, to grow and to know the meaning of beloved community.

7.    Use the principles of Unitarian Universalism to inform your life.

This is a true partnership of heart and spirit and mind and action. Each person here, by your presence is part of the well spring that both needs and offers itself. A whole greater than the sum of the parts. Holy indeed.

 

I invite Bryan French, our congregation president, representing our elected leadership, Dodie Bertilson our Program Council chair representing our committees and volunteers, Traci Eaton representing our staff, and Destri Irwin representing all of you to please join me in lighting the covenant candle representing the partnership that is hope and the promise of our congregation. All may join in singing #123 Spirit of Life.